Thor Power Xpert 2.0 Design Review and Analysis Challenge

• Create a document that explains all Thor Power Xpert screens & functionalities with potential elements to replace with Power Xpert Blue Design System
• This document will be a guidebook for the future developer to upgrade the Thor Power Xpert application

• Please read this project overview, access repo, and how to set up the application here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JOqy_Ffb6qPC3iCZfXMlpcMm6o3bD1I9hfF_RrEMVw4/edit?usp=sharing

• We are going to redesign Thor Power Xpert to follow the latest Power Xpert Blue Design.
• For this challenge, we need your help to create a document that will be a guidebook for the future developer to upgrade the Thor Power Xpert application.
• You may follow this document template as a starting point: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HRiAzhBIfurYELtnxiiQ9yKn1EdmdfDi1Ymqg5Rl0CI/edit?usp=sharing
• List all elements that are displayed on every page.
• List the demo URL of related Power Xpert Blue elements on the page. Note: we use Angular as the base framework
• If there are no exact Power Xpert Blue elements, please find the related Material Design. The PX Blue will automatically include these libraries:
  • Angular Material Component Library (@angular/material)
  • PX Blue Component Library (@pxblue/angular-components)
  • PX Blue Themes (@pxblue/angular-themes)
  • PX Blue Icons (@pxblue/icons)
  • PX Blue Colors (@pxblue/colors)
  • Open Sans web font (typeface-open-sans)
  • PX Blue ESLint and Prettier configurations, if selected (@pxblue/eslint-config / @pxblue/prettier-config)
• For detailed usage instructions, refer to the PX Blue CLI documentation.
• List existing libraries that remain the same.
• Where is the source code for layout and functionalities on the current page?
• Possible to maintain the current code after the redesign?
• Describe any advantages OR obstacles after the redesign?
• Any notes about current pages?

• This challenge will be using subjective decision, we will score against the following:
• Accuracy of written brief describing Thor Power Xpert 2.0 Design Review & Analysis
• Detailed Documentation (screenshots, logs, other resources)
• An action plan which suggests ways to mitigate the issue (doesn't need to be code solutions or fixes, just suggestions like if caused by a specific interaction, these interactions can be changed as suggested in this resource: <example resource>)
• You may submit in PDF, Word, or any standard document type

Final Submission Guidelines

• Document Review & Analysis
• Possible to achieve the expected Project Success Criteria?
• A verification document containing steps to verify your solution.
• Video/Image screenshot for Validation Purposes